βœ“

You Are Correct!

Data Control & Process
πŸ“Š
Why You're Right
β–Ό
Data hierarchy created blind spots. The system protected "mainstream sensitive" data (religion, disability, ethnicity) but ignored cultural trauma markers like historical symbols.
πŸ›‘οΈ Protected by Default
Religion β€’ Disability β€’ Ethnicity
(What majority parents understood as "sensitive")
>
❌ Ignored Completely
Cultural Trauma β€’ Historical Symbols
(Orange lilies = genocide to Eastervillians)

The training decision: AI was fed "regional and cultural data" that emphasized mainstream markers while systematically excluding marginalized historical experiences.

πŸ“‹ Data Controller: "Parents most definitely wanted not to appear on the platform [...] sensitive data about religion or disability or ethnic origin"
← Notice what's missing: cultural trauma, historical symbols
⚠️
But There’s More to the Story: The Automation Death Spiral
β–Ό
πŸ’€ The perfect storm: Low-tolerance automation + Cultural blindness + Zero human oversight = Systematic oppression
πŸ”„ System Compound Failures:
β€’ 100% parent agreement on "zero tolerance" β†’ Weaponized automation
β€’ "Mainstream cultural data" β†’ Excluded minority experiences
β€’ No human oversight β†’ No cultural context checks
β€’ Low-tolerance warnings β†’ Silenced trauma victims

The vicious cycle: Data control decisions created automated systems that systematically silenced the very communities most harmed by cultural insensitivity.

πŸ‘¨β€βš•οΈ
When Automation Destroys Innocent Lives
β–Ό
πŸ₯
Google's Medical Photo Nightmare (2022)
🩺
Doctor's Request: Father photographs son's inflamed groin for telemedicine diagnosis
πŸ’Š
Medical Success: Photos lead to successful antibiotic treatment
πŸ€–
AI Catastrophe: Automated system flags medical photos as child abuse
🚨
Life Destroyed: Account banned, police investigation launched
❌
Permanent Ban
Despite police clearance
πŸ‘₯
"Humans in Loop"
Not actual doctors
πŸ”’
No Appeal
System inflexibility
🎯 Same Pattern: Automated system designed to protect children ended up destroying an innocent father's digital lifeβ€”just like Pine Valley's "anti-bullying" system silenced trauma victims.
"Tech companies have tremendously invasive access to data about people's lives yet lack context of what people's lives actually are. These systems can cause real problems for people with terrible consequences in terms of false positives."
β€” Daniel Kahn Gillmor, ACLU technologist

The core danger: When we automate moral and legal judgments, we create systems that lack human context and destroy innocent lives. Read The Guardian's investigation β†’

Do you want to explore other possible responses?
β–Ό
  • Click here to learn more about the impact of Design and Specification Processes
  • Click here to learn more about the impact of Cultural Environment
  • Click here to learn more about the impact of School Leadership
  • Click here to learn more about the impact of Technical Development Processes